<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Lippis Report &#187; Data Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lippisreport.com/tag/data-center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lippisreport.com</link>
	<description>Resources for Network / IT Business Decision Makers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:59:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lippis Report 153: Why Ethernet will be the dominant Two Tier High End Data Center Network Fabric</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/lippis-report-153-why-ethernet-will-be-the-dominant-two-tier-high-end-data-center-network-fabric/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/lippis-report-153-why-ethernet-will-be-the-dominant-two-tier-high-end-data-center-network-fabric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lippis Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100GbE.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arista Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLADE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FabricPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-tier network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voltaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F07%2Flippis-report-153-why-ethernet-will-be-the-dominant-two-tier-high-end-data-center-network-fabric%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FdNeBs%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Lippis%20Report%20153%3A%20Why%20Ethernet%20will%20be%20the%20dominant%20Two%20Tier%20High%20End%20Data%20Center%20Network%20Fabric%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2009/07/lippis-report-130-global-it-security-threat-trends-and-future-outlook/nicklippisjpg/" rel="attachment wp-att-171"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/nicklippis.jpg" alt="nicklippis.jpg" title="nicklippis.jpg" width="97" height="122" class="alignright size-full wp-image-171" /></a>In Lippis Report 151: A Two or Three Tier High-End&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F07%2Flippis-report-153-why-ethernet-will-be-the-dominant-two-tier-high-end-data-center-network-fabric%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FdNeBs%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Lippis%20Report%20153%3A%20Why%20Ethernet%20will%20be%20the%20dominant%20Two%20Tier%20High%20End%20Data%20Center%20Network%20Fabric%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2009/07/lippis-report-130-global-it-security-threat-trends-and-future-outlook/nicklippisjpg/" rel="attachment wp-att-171"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/nicklippis.jpg" alt="nicklippis.jpg" title="nicklippis.jpg" width="97" height="122" class="alignright size-full wp-image-171" /></a>In Lippis Report 151: A Two or Three Tier High-End Data Center Ethernet Fabric Architecture? we detailed the new two tier data center Ethernet fabric that is becoming conventional wisdom amongst business leaders of high end data centers and cloud computing service providers.  The networking industry is headed for a major innovation and competitive cycle fueled by a multi-billion dollar addressable market for data center network fabrics.   Over the last eighteen months, every major Ethernet infrastructure provider has announced or taken a position on two tier network fabrics for high-end data centers.  Companies such as Cisco, Arista Networks, Force10, Voltaire, HP/3Com, Juniper, Extreme, Brocade, BLADE Network Technology, et al have announced network fabrics for data centers with two thousand and more servers that either support storage enablement or not.  In this Lippis Report Research Note, we review why it is Ethernet that will be the network fabric of high performance computing or HPC and cloud computing deployments.</p>
<p><span id="more-3276"></span></p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/cgriffin.jpg" /><strong>Cisco Launches FabricPath Switching System For Scalable Data Center Ethernet Fabrics</strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3204">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p>For high-end data centers, HPC plus private and public cloud computing networks connecting thousands of servers, a new set of requirements have emerged.  Low latency and high performance are the two driving requirements.  Yes, there are more, especially when the fabric needs to enable converged storage, but let’s focus on latency and performance for now.  Traditional three tier (server access, distribution and core) fabrics designed primarily for north-south traffic flows, that is client-server computing utilized spanning tree protocol (STP) and slower speed Ethernet (100Mbs to 1Gbs).    Thanks to web 2.0, mash-ups and social networking sites east-to-west or server-server traffic flows have spiked requiring networks to support both north-south and east-west flows.</p>
<p>As most network engineers know, STP was designed to avoid loops that confused Ethernet as it was designed as a bus topology.  STP shuts down redundant links between common switches to maintain the bus.  Therefore, connecting access switches to distribution switches utilizing STP would require that network engineers over-subscribe the links between switches as only half of the bandwidth could be used.  Oversubscription would also create blocking of packets between points too.  To avoid this design, nearly every major switch manufacturer offered link aggregation that is the ability to shut off STP and aggregate links between switches.  While this was and is a benefit, the down side has been that vendors only offered the ability to aggregate two links, which still drove oversubscription and blocking.</p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" /><strong>Force10 Is First To Offer 40 Giga bit Ethernet For The Data Center </strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3067">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p>Recently, industry players such as Cisco and Arista Networks have offered the ability to scale up aggregation of links from 16 to 32, while at the same time delivering multipathing that allows packets to be forwarded across multiple links to arrive at its intended destination.  Switch-processing capacity to support these massive inter-switch links have been increased too.  These design changes, along with Ethernet’s innovation march, has ushered in the two-tier network design fabric option.</p>
<p>A two-tier fabric is designed with two kinds of switches; one that connects servers and the second that connect switches creating a non-blocking, low latency fabric.  We use the terms ‘leaf’ switch to denote server connecting switches and ‘spine’ to denote switches that connect leaf switches.  Together a leaf and spin architecture create the network fabric.  </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Cloud Networking Platform</p>
<p><a class="link_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3262">Visit the Link</a></p>
</div>
<p>In late June 2010, Cisco announced its’ FabricPatch Switching System or FSS and its’ F-Series modules that support 32 ports of 10GbE of auto-sensing 1/10GbE and is essentially for server access and aggregation.  FabricPath provides a new level of bandwidth scale to connect Nexus switches and delivers a new fabric design option with unique attributes for IT architects and designers.  FabricPath is a NX-OS innovation, meaning that its’ capabilities are embedded within the NX-OS network OS for the data center.  FabricPath essentially is multipath Ethernet; a scheme that provides high-throughput, reduced and more deterministic latency, and greater resiliency compared to traditional Ethernet.</p>
<p>FabricPath combines today&#8217;s layer 2 or Ethernet networking attributes and enhances it with layer 3 capabilities.  In short, FabricPath brings some of the capabilities available in routing into a traditional switching context.  For example, FabricPath offers the benefits of layer 2 switching such as low cost, easy configuration and workload flexibility.  What this means is that when IT needs to move VMs and/or applications around the data center to different physical locations, it can do so in a simple and straightforward manner without requiring VLAN, IP address and other network reconfiguration.  In essence, FabricPath delivers plug and play capability, which has been an early design attribute of Ethernet.  Further, large broadcast domains and storms inherent in layer 2 networks that occurred during the mid 1990s have been mitigated with technologies such as VLAN pruning, Reverse Path Forwarding, Time-to-Live, etc.</p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">A Simpler Data Center Fabric Emerges For The Age of Massively Scalable Data Centers </p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3177">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>The layer 3 capabilities added to FabricPath deliver scalable bandwidth allowing IT architects to build much larger layer 2 networks with very high cross-sectional bandwidth eliminating the need for oversubscription.  In addition, FabricPath affords high availability as it eliminates STP, which only allows one path and blocks all others, and replaces it with multiple paths between endpoints within the data center. This offers increased redundancy as traffic has multiple paths in which to reach its final destination. </p>
<p>FabricPath employs routing techniques such as building a route table of different nodes in a network.  It possesses a routing protocol, which calculates paths that packets can traverse through the network.  What is being added to FabricPath is the ability for the control plane or the routing protocols to know the topology of the network and choose different routes for traffic to flow.   Not only can FabricPath choose different routes, it can use multiple routes simultaneously so traffic can span across multiple routes at once.  These layer 3 features enable FabricPath to use all links between switches to pass traffic as STP is no longer used and would shut down redundant links to eliminate loops.  Therefore, this would yield incremental levels of resiliency and bandwidth capacity, which is paramount as compute and virtualization density continue to raise driving scale requirements up. </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">STP MiTM Attack and L2 Mitigation Techniques on the Cisco Catalyst 6500</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3259">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Designing A 160 Tbps Data Center Fabric</strong></p>
<p>As an example to how multi link aggregation, the elimination of STP, high switching capacity and 10GbE connections create a highly scalable two-tier layer 2 Ethernet fabric, we use Cisco’s FSS and its’ F-Series module in the Nexus 7000.  The following details the design of a 160 Tbps switching fabric with FabricPath and the F-Series module for high performance data centers using Cisco’s Nexus 7000 switches.  This architecture can support over 8,000 servers connected at 10GbE or 4,000 servers dual homed at 10GbE with attributes of being non-blocking, low latency (5 microseconds), high bandwidth, reliability, plus simplicity of workload movement.</p>
<p>To build a 160 Tbps two-tier fabric, thirty-two Nexus 7018 switches populated with F-Series 10GbE modules would connect servers.  These thirty switches are leaf switches.  Each leaf chassis provides 256 10GbE ports to connect servers and another 256 10GbE ports to connect into spine switches.   Therefore, each leaf is directly connected to each spine with sixteen FabricPath ports at 10GbE equaling a total of 256 10GbE ports for each leaf switch.  There are sixteen spine switches each accepting 512 10GbE FabricPath ports.  A single leaf chassis connects 256 10GbE ports into a spine equaling approximately 2.5Tbs.  Multiplying each thirty-two leaf’s contribution into the fabric yields 80Tbs.  As Ethernet is full-duplex, the total fabric switching capacity is 160<br />
Tbps. Therefore, 160Tbps of switching fabric is available across all thirty-two leaf chassis.  As 256 10GbE equals 2.5 Tbs, which also equals 16 FabricPath links to each one of sixteen spine switches, yields 2.5 Tbs, the fabric is non-blocking. </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Building Mission-Critical Data Center</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3199">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>As for layer 2 and layer 3 forwarding, the job of the spine is to forward packets from leaf switches at layer 2, creating a single tier fabric.  A key attribute of this architecture is that each 16-way FabricPath links are Equal Cost Multipathing or ECMP.  What 16-way FabricPath ECMP provides are two benefits:  1) It delivers more paths for traffic to flow, which increases available bandwidth in the fabric and 2) as they&#8217;re distributed across all switches, diversity of routes is enabled to distribute packet forwarding.  In essence what 16-way FabricPath ECMP provides is a very low latency, high bandwidth approach to supporting both north-to-south and east-to-west traffic flows simultaneously. </p>
<p>While the above is a Cisco deployment example Arista’s new 7500 series of Ethernet switches support 6 Billion packets per second at wire speed.  The 7500s can be configured into a massive two-tier network fabric thanks to it support of 32 port MLAG (Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation) affording the connection of 18,000 to 30,000 servers.</p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3096">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>Ethernet continues to evolve.  The IEEE recently ratified the 40 and 100 GbE standard with vendors such as Force 10, Cisco, Arista, Extreme, BLADE, Brocade, Voltaire, HP et al announcing support and scheduling product delivery.  While the above two-tier network example provides the perspective from the large switch provider, below is BLADE Network Technologies perspective, a company focused on server connectivity.</p>
<p>BLADE Network Technologies believes that as Ethernet delivers new levels of speed and intelligence, it will be the dominant two-tier network fabric for high-end next-generation data centers.<br />
For many applications, low latency is a key requirement, and latency is an area where two-tier networks excel. Studies of stock trading exchanges have shown that tens of milliseconds of delay in data delivery can represent a ten percent drop in revenues, and delays of even five microseconds per trade can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Industry-specific requirements for uncompressed data and end-to-end deterministic latency within tens of microseconds make attaining such performance even more difficult. These factors have combined to make raw switching speed a top priority, and today’s best-of-breed 10 Gigabit Ethernet switches achieve can operate with under 700 nanoseconds of port-to-port latency while consuming a miniscule amount of power equivalent to that of standard light bulbs. </p>
<p>As next-generation networks get flatter – driven by latency and bandwidth requirements – emerging Layer 2 technologies such as the IETF’s Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links or TRILL, enable this trend. The idea behind TRILL is to replace spanning tree as a mechanism to find loop free trees within Layer 2 broadcast domains. Using a routing protocol to build forwarding trees within a Layer 2 broadcast domain enables the flexibility and efficiency to route Layer 2 traffic, just like one would Layer 3 traffic, without the overhead associated with Layer 3 packet processing. TRILL will offer important features, such as support for both broadcast and multicast, load splitting along multiples paths, support for multiple points of attachment, and no tangible delay in service after attachment.</p>
<p>In the data center, bottlenecks are moving from the CPU and memory access to the I/O of the servers.  Today’s multi-core servers are now able to sustain a great amount of traffic, requiring fast, flat networks, especially now that virtualization is widely deployed.  Analysts have predicted that the 10G market will double year-to-year in 2010 and 2011.  More servers using 10G increases the requirement for 40G and 100G in upstream networks. With 10G widely available and 40G coming online, Ethernet networks can enable data and storage traffic to use a single wire, using FCoE or iSCSI for example, and provide the raw speed that makes Ethernet with its economies of scale, to supplant InfiniBand for HPC requirements.</p>
<p>The reason Ethernet will be the network fabric for high-end data center networks is that the vendor community continues to innovate and build upon this protocol.   Ethernet innovations are many and are beyond bandwidth increases from 10Mbs, 100Mbs, 1Gbs, 10Gbs, 40Gbs and 100Gbs, which are obvious.  Link aggregation, multi-pathing and so much more propel Ethernet’s relevance and suitability to new challenging networking requirements. </p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3276&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3276" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/lippis-report-153-why-ethernet-will-be-the-dominant-two-tier-high-end-data-center-network-fabric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Launches FabricPath Switching System For Scalable Data Center Ethernet Fabrics</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/cisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/cisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought Leader Podcast Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40GbE. 100GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FabricPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fcisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2Fdb8Qm%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Cisco%20Launches%20FabricPath%20Switching%20System%20For%20Scalable%20Data%20Center%20Ethernet%20Fabrics%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3180" href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/cisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics/cgriffin/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3180" title="Craig Griffin" src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/cgriffin.jpg" alt="Craig Griffin" width="66" height="88" /></a>Massively scalable data centers have unique requirements such as low&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fcisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2Fdb8Qm%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Cisco%20Launches%20FabricPath%20Switching%20System%20For%20Scalable%20Data%20Center%20Ethernet%20Fabrics%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3180" href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/cisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics/cgriffin/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3180" title="Craig Griffin" src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/cgriffin.jpg" alt="Craig Griffin" width="66" height="88" /></a>Massively scalable data centers have unique requirements such as low latency, high performance, non-stop operation, simplicity of design, workload mobility and storage transport support.  To address these requirements Cisco launched FabricPath, which is a scalable multi-link and multipath technology allowing 2 to 48 Nexus 7000s to be configured in a large, non-blocking Ethernet switch fabric.  This fabric, called a FabricPath Switching System or FSS, eliminates oversubscription and creates a two-tier fabric.   In addition to FabricPath, Cisco launched its’ F-Series 10GbE module for the Nexus 7000, which offers 32 ports of auto-sensing 1/10GbE targeted at server access, aggregation and FCoE implementations solutions.  Craig Griffin, Senior Director of Product Management for Cisco’s Nexus 7000 discusses new Ethernet innovations for the age of massively scalable data centers.</p>
<p>A white paper on the topic is available <a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3177">here:</a>
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/cisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics/">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3204&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3204" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/07/cisco-launches-fabricpath-switching-system-for-scalable-data-center-ethernet-fabrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lippis Report 151: A Two or Three Tier High-End Data Center Ethernet Fabric Architecture?</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/lippis-report-151-a-two-or-three-tier-high-end-data-center-ethernet-fabric-architecture/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/lippis-report-151-a-two-or-three-tier-high-end-data-center-ethernet-fabric-architecture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lippis Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100GbE.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FabricPath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three-tier network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two-tier network]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F06%2Flippis-report-151-a-two-or-three-tier-high-end-data-center-ethernet-fabric-architecture%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FdaKiU%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Lippis%20Report%20151%3A%20A%20Two%20or%20Three%20Tier%20High-End%20Data%20Center%20Ethernet%20Fabric%20Architecture%3F%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2009/07/lippis-report-130-global-it-security-threat-trends-and-future-outlook/nicklippisjpg/" rel="attachment wp-att-171"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/nicklippis.jpg" alt="nicklippis.jpg" title="nicklippis.jpg" width="97" height="122" class="alignright size-full wp-image-171" /></a>It hasn’t been since the mid 1990s that the networking&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F06%2Flippis-report-151-a-two-or-three-tier-high-end-data-center-ethernet-fabric-architecture%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FdaKiU%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Lippis%20Report%20151%3A%20A%20Two%20or%20Three%20Tier%20High-End%20Data%20Center%20Ethernet%20Fabric%20Architecture%3F%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2009/07/lippis-report-130-global-it-security-threat-trends-and-future-outlook/nicklippisjpg/" rel="attachment wp-att-171"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/nicklippis.jpg" alt="nicklippis.jpg" title="nicklippis.jpg" width="97" height="122" class="alignright size-full wp-image-171" /></a>It hasn’t been since the mid 1990s that the networking industry was focused on multi-protocol integration or convergence.  The industry is gearing up for a major innovation and competitive cycle fueled by the multi-billion dollar addressable market for data center network fabrics.  Over the last eighteen months, every major Ethernet infrastructure provider has been talking about two and three tier network fabrics for high-end data centers.  Companies such as Cisco, Arista Networks, HP/3Com, Force10, Voltaire, Extreme, Brocade, Juniper et al have announced network fabrics for data centers with five thousand and more servers with and without storage enablement.  Juniper talks of a one-tier fabric through their Project Stratus work with IBM to be available some time in the future.  Brocade recently introduced its’ Brocade One, which is a converged data center fabric.  Cisco just launched its’ FabricPath Switching System or FSS for the Nexus 7000 that enables massive scale of a two-tier fabric.  In this Lippis Report Research Note, we review the architectural attributes of two and three tier network fabrics and review FSS and its accompanying F-Series 10GbE module.</p>
<p><span id="more-3209"></span></p>
<p>The IT industry is at an inflection point as service delivery is becoming more and more centralized thanks to data center consolidation, virtualization, cloud and mobile computing.  It is estimated that a third of all IT spend is concentrated in the data center and this trend is only building thanks to favorable economics, motivating IT business leaders to centralize IT delivery.  </p>
<p>The impact of this trend is more and more dense data centers made up of servers in the thousands to tens of thousands and higher.  It is at the scale of 5,000 plus servers that a new network fabric is required for high-end data centers.  High-end data center design is challenged with increasing complexity, the need for greater workload mobility and reduced energy consumption.  Traffic patterns have also shifted significantly, from primarily client-server or as commonly referred to as north-to-south flows, to a combination of client-server and server-server or east-to-west plus north-to-south streams.  These shifts have wreaked havoc on application response time and end user experience, since the network is not designed for these Brownian motion type flows.</p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/cgriffin.jpg" /><strong> Cisco Launches FabricPath Switching System For Scalable Data Center Ethernet Fabrics </strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3204">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p>The main requirements for high-end data center network fabric are low latency, large flat layer 2 domains to enable workload mobility, low power consumption, simplicity of design and significant bandwidth.  Storage enablement, meaning consolidated I/O or virtualized I/O, is a growing priority and a new fabric that can support FiberChannel over Ethernet, iSCSI over Ethernet, iWARP over Ethernet or Infiniband over Ethernet is a major plus.  One salient observation is that it’s pretty clear that Ethernet is the network fabric of choice as it is the only network protocol that enjoys continual innovation such as TRILL, Data Center Bridging, link aggregation, multi-pathing, and soon, 40 Gbs and 100 Gbs speeds.  With the above requirements in mind, let us review data center network design options.</p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/Bob_Wood.jpg" /><strong>A Modern Approach To FAX Management Via Unified Communications </strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3185">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Two and Three Tier Fabrics</strong></p>
<p>A three-tier network architecture is the dominant structure in data centers today and will likely continue as the optimal design for many networks.   For most network architects and administrators, this type of design provides the best balance of asset utilization, layer 3 routing for segmentation, scaling and services, plus efficient physical design for cabling and fiber runs.  By three tiers, we mean access switches/Top-of-Rack (ToR) switches, or modular/End-of-Row (EoR) switches that connect to servers and IP based storage.  These access switches are connected via Ethernet to aggregation switches.  The aggregation switches are connected into a set of core switches or routers that forward traffic flows from servers to an intranet and internet, and between the aggregation switches.  It’s common in this structure to over-subscribe bandwidth in the access tier, and to a lesser degree, in the aggregation tier, which can increase latency and reduce performance.  Inherent in this structure is the placement of layer 2 versus layer 3 forwarding that is Virtual Local Area Networking or VLANs and IP routing.  Also common, is that VLANs are constructed within access and aggregation switches, while layer 3 capabilities in the aggregation or core switches route between them.  </p>
<p>But within the high-end data center market, where the number of servers is in the thousands to tens of thousands plus and east-west bandwidth is significant, is where a new structure is needed.  It is within these data centers where applications need a single layer 2 domain.  </p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" /><strong>Making Networks More Agile With Force10’s Open Automation</strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3139">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Two-tiers of network fabric</strong></p>
<p>A two-tier fabric is designed with two kinds of switches: one that connects servers, and the second that connect switches creating a non-blocking, low latency fabric.  In short, there are server facing and fabric facing switches.  We use the terms ‘leaf’ switch to denote server facing or connecting switches and ‘spine’ to denote fabric facing or switches that connect leaf switches into the fabric.  Together, a leaf and spine architecture create the fabric. </p>
<p>Many IT leaders in Global 2000 firms will have deployed both two and three tier network structure, as different deployment models are used for different applications.  For these leaders, a network equipment supplier is needed that possesses product architecture flexibility, meaning an end-to-end product solution that accommodates tier two and three fabrics.  This flexibility is found in product that supports layer 2 and layer 3 forwarding, as well as, a variety of line cards to offer design options.  </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">A Simpler Data Center Fabric Emerges<br />
For The Age of Massively Scalable Data Centers</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3177">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>A common network Operating System (OS) of products configured for two and three tier structure is important as IT operations gain efficiency to manage fabrics, as configuration and management are consistent.  In addition, a common network OS offers rapid absorption of innovation to IT operations, as new OS features are available at the same time to all fabrics.  The benefit of using a common product set to build tier two or three fabrics offers value around operational efficiency, training, sparing and ease of evolution between fabric deployments.  In short, the network fabric needs to be simple and general purpose versus purpose built, which a common set of products creating tier two or three fabrics offer.  This type of flexibility will enable IT leaders to address the challenges of scale outlined above.</p>
<p>In addition to product flexibility, some networking suppliers take a systems approach to their fabric design, meaning that a solution is built and pre-tested before it arrives on site.  This ensures that IT does not have to perform system integration.  With the increased concentration of computing and IT dollars into data centers, it’s only obvious that data centers are long-term corporate commitments.  Therefore, it is only appropriate that the networking supplier of choice also has a proven long-term commitment to their product architecture.  </p>
<p>Perhaps the best example of this is Cisco’s Catalyst 6000 switching architecture and its’ two-year-old Nexus product line.  The Catalyst investment protection is well documented as it has been in operation for over a decade, which Cisco customers enjoy continued innovation and value added to this platform.  Competitors view its’ longevity as a weakness.  The Nexus product line has a similar investment protection philosophy with a fifteen-year plus lifespan expectation.  Common to both Catalyst and Nexus is the fact that these products are built on silicon, developed at Cisco, affording investment protection from one generation of the hardware to the next.  </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Leading the Way to Borderless Networks</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3194">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>A Unified Fabric</p>
<p>The concept of a unified fabric is to virtualize data center resources and connect them through a high bandwidth network that is very scalable, high performance and enables the convergence of multiple protocols onto a single physical network.  These IT resources are compute, storage and applications, which are connected via a network fabric.  In short, the network is the unified fabric and the network is Ethernet.</p>
<p>The industry tends to focus on storage transport over Ethernet as the main concept behind a unified fabric with technologies such as Fiber Channel over Ethernet or FCoE, iSCSI over Ethernet, iWARP over Ethernet and even Infiniband over Ethernet.  But this is a narrow view of a unified fabric, which is being expanded thanks to continual innovation of Ethernet by the vendor community and standards organizations such as the IEEE and IETF.   Ethernet innovations such as FCoE, Data Center Bridging or DCB, link aggregation, Cisco&#8217;s VN-Link, FEX-Link and virtual PortChannel or vPC have enhanced Ethernet networking to support a wide range of new data center fabric design options.  In addition to these protocol enhancements, the IEEE is scheduled to complete its’ work on defining 40Gb and 100Gb Ethernet during the summer of 2010, significantly increasing Ethernet’s ability to scale bandwidth. To demonstrate how Ethernet is evolving to be the unified fabric for high-end data centers, we explore Cisco’s new FabricPath Switching System innovation in this <a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3177">white pape</a>r.  </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Building Mission-Critical Data Center</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3199">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>The decision to implement a two or three tier network structure comes down to scale.  For high-end data centers, a two-tier structure meets the requirements of low latency, movable workloads, scale, simplicity, etc.  Many global 2000 concerns will have deployed both a two and three tier network fabric for their high end and less dense data centers.  </p>
<p>When shopping for network equipment to construct two and three tier network fabrics, look for suppliers that support both rich Layer 3 routing services and scalable Layer 2 Ethernet capabilities to ensure choice and flexibility of three tier and scalable two tier fabric implementations.  Such suppliers offer products that can be configured in multiple use cases and topologies where modules are inter-changeable, skills transferable and operations common between both fabric approaches.</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3209&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3209" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/lippis-report-151-a-two-or-three-tier-high-end-data-center-ethernet-fabric-architecture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Siemens Changes UC Market with OpenScape UC Server 2010</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/siemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/siemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Server 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fsiemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcPucX%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Siemens%20Changes%20UC%20Market%20with%20OpenScape%20UC%20Server%202010%20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/siemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010/kathy_heilmann/" rel="attachment wp-att-3146"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/Kathy_Heilmann-150x150.jpg" alt="Kathy Heilmann" title="Kathy Heilmann" width="150" height="150" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-3146" /></a>The Unified Communications (UC) market is changing significantly in terms&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fsiemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcPucX%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Siemens%20Changes%20UC%20Market%20with%20OpenScape%20UC%20Server%202010%20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/siemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010/kathy_heilmann/" rel="attachment wp-att-3146"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/Kathy_Heilmann-150x150.jpg" alt="Kathy Heilmann" title="Kathy Heilmann" width="150" height="150" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-3146" /></a>The Unified Communications (UC) market is changing significantly in terms of how solutions are deployed, services are packaged and systems procured.  Siemens addressed all of these areas in one fell swoop with the recently released OpenScape UC Server 2010.  Siemens announced new licensing options for endpoints and integrated UC endpoint services in packaged solutions including social media plug-ins such as Twitter. Kathy Heilmann, Director, Large Enterprise Voice and UC Solutions Marketing at Siemens Enterprise Communications joined me to talk about the new rules of UC procurement and its value to IT business leaders.
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/siemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010/">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3141&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3141" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/siemens-changes-uc-market-with-openscape-uc-server-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Networks More Agile With Force10’s Open Automation</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/making-networks-more-agile-with-force10%e2%80%99s-open-automation/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/making-networks-more-agile-with-force10%e2%80%99s-open-automation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Force10 Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40GbE. 100GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Force10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fmaking-networks-more-agile-with-force10%25e2%2580%2599s-open-automation%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcPtlu%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Making%20Networks%20More%20Agile%20With%20Force10%E2%80%99s%20Open%20Automation%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/12/gaining-network-visibility-into-virtualized-infrastructure/stepheng/" rel="attachment wp-att-1104"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" alt="stepheng" title="stepheng" width="125" height="150" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1104" /></a>Networking has become “rigid”. Yes, I know it’s almost absurd&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fmaking-networks-more-agile-with-force10%25e2%2580%2599s-open-automation%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcPtlu%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Making%20Networks%20More%20Agile%20With%20Force10%E2%80%99s%20Open%20Automation%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/12/gaining-network-visibility-into-virtualized-infrastructure/stepheng/" rel="attachment wp-att-1104"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" alt="stepheng" title="stepheng" width="125" height="150" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1104" /></a>Networking has become “rigid”. Yes, I know it’s almost absurd to attribute inflexibility or rigidity to networking, but we are in a compute innovation cycle that’s driving a fundamental change in networking, which screams out the need for more flexibility and configuration automation.  The well understood problem is that when a virtualized machine is moved from one physical machine to another, the network, load balancers, firewalls/IPS, broadcast domains, etc., have to be reconfigured. There is no automation in place, meaning that the network is not flexible or agile enough to make the changes required. Networking companies such as Force10 Networks are driving an open approach to automation to enable network changes. I spoke with Steve Garrison, Vice President Marketing for Force10 Networks about their “Open Automation” approach to networking.  Enjoy, Nick
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/making-networks-more-agile-with-force10%e2%80%99s-open-automation/">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3139&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3139" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/06/making-networks-more-agile-with-force10%e2%80%99s-open-automation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lippis Report 149: High End 10GbE Data Center Switches Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/lippis-report-149-high-end-10gbe-data-center-switches-reviewed/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/lippis-report-149-high-end-10gbe-data-center-switches-reviewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lippis Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100 GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40 GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arista Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avaya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLADE Network Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Force10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voltaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F05%2Flippis-report-149-high-end-10gbe-data-center-switches-reviewed%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcxqcM%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Lippis%20Report%20149%3A%20High%20End%2010GbE%20Data%20Center%20Switches%20Reviewed%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2009/07/lippis-report-130-global-it-security-threat-trends-and-future-outlook/nicklippisjpg/" rel="attachment wp-att-171"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/nicklippis.jpg" alt="nicklippis.jpg" title="nicklippis.jpg" width="97" height="122" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-171" /></a><br />
In Lippis Report 148 we reviewed the major drivers and&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F05%2Flippis-report-149-high-end-10gbe-data-center-switches-reviewed%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcxqcM%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Lippis%20Report%20149%3A%20High%20End%2010GbE%20Data%20Center%20Switches%20Reviewed%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2009/07/lippis-report-130-global-it-security-threat-trends-and-future-outlook/nicklippisjpg/" rel="attachment wp-att-171"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/nicklippis.jpg" alt="nicklippis.jpg" title="nicklippis.jpg" width="97" height="122" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-171" /></a><br />
In Lippis Report 148 we reviewed the major drivers and trends that are propelling the high-end data center Ethernet switch market to well over a $1B annual run rate.  In this Lippis Report Research Note, we review the major suppliers of these switches.  We review Cisco, Arista Networks Force10 Networks, BLADE Network Technologies, HP/3Com/H3C, Voltaire, Avaya, Brocade, and Juniper and identify their unique positions and offerings to participants in the burgeoning market.  Our focus is the high-end, high density 10GbE switches that are enabling virtualized cloud computing data centers thanks to Terabits per second of back plane switching capacity, billions of packets per second of layer 2/3 forwarding, hundreds of 10GbE port connectivity per chassis, a new two-tier architecture, microsecond level latency, low power consumption, non-stop operation and software hooks that eliminate network barriers to large scale server virtualization.  The engineering in these switches should be celebrated, as they represent the state-of-the-art in computer and network design.  In short, they represent the fundamental building block of a new generation of IT delivery based upon cloud computing and virtualization.  This Research Note is a must read for any IT executive designing a data center. </p>
<p>After finishing this Research Note, it became evident that this market needs a set of industry neural 10GbE switch test to independently verify vendor claims.  We hope to make such a contribution this Fall.<br />
<span id="more-3109"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/09/managing-data-center-power-and-cooling/force10/" rel="attachment wp-att-1045"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/force10.gif" alt="force10" title="force10" width="301" height="86" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1045" /></a></p>
<p><br/><br />
<br/><br />
<br/></p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" /><strong>Force10 Is First To Offer 40 Giga bit Ethernet For The Data Center </strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3067">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Cisco Systems Nexus Family of Switches</strong></p>
<p>Cisco’s approach to data center Ethernet switching is rooted in its Data Center 3.0 strategy which seeks to scale server virtualization while introducing a platform to enable a unified fabric or converged network and storage running on one physical Ethernet network.  Cisco’s data center Ethernet switch portfolio is primarily the Nexus family of switches including the 7000, 5000, 2000 and 1000v.  NX-OS is a purpose built data center operating system that runs across the entire Nexus family.  NX-OS integrates a number of higher system availability functionalities such as virtual port- channel (vPC), and the capability to upgrade software without disrupting traffic. The Nexus 1000v is a softswitch that resides in a VM hypervisor.  The Nexus 1000v’s main job is to eliminate network configuration barriers that exist when moving a VM from one physical machine to another.  To accomplish this, the 1000v creates a port profile including VLAN, ACL, policy, security, etc. with persistence, which moves with a VM as a virtualization administer moves a VM from one physical machine to another.</p>
<p>The Nexus 2000 family of Fabric Extenders (FEX) introduces the concept of a remote line card of the parent Nexus 5000 switches and sits on the top-of-rack connecting servers to the switch fabric.  The extender concept allows the 2000 and 5000 to be managed as one switch.  This configuration reduces cabling requirements and offers an economical approach to server connection, thus providing the benefits of both end-of-row and top-of-rack deployments. The Nexus 5000 Series is 10 Gb Ethernet and Unified Fabric capable switches, connecting Nexus 2000s and servers directly at 100/1/10GbE/FCoE, while providing layer 2 forwarding.  Providing layer 3 forwarding, dense 1/10GbE connectivity is the Nexus 7000 Series. The Nexus 7000 Series is available in a 10 and 18 slot chassis and is Cisco’s flagship data center Ethernet switch series.  As a point of reference, the Nexus 7000 is now on an annualized run rate of $1B for Cisco, which is more than 10 times greater than any other switch supplier in the data center switch market.  The high end 7000 connects 512 10GbE ports with 128 line-rate 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports.  The Nexus 7000 Series switches can be segmented into virtual devices, delivering true segmentation of network traffic, context-level fault isolation, and management through the creation of independent hardware and software partitions. Overlay Virtualization Transport (OTV) provides customers a simplified DCI solution by extending layer 2 VLANs over existing IP networks.  We have profiled the Nexus 7000 when first released and is available <a href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/02/lippis-report-issue-99-cisco-and-juniper-launch-new-switching-platforms-one-is-innovative-one-is-not/">here</a>.  The Nexus switches can create a two-tier architecture with the 2000/5000, providing server connectivity and layer 2 forwarding between servers.  The Nexus 7000 connects the 2000/5000 to each other and the internet/intranet with high density, high reliability layer 2/3 forwarding.</p>
<div class="pod_wide">
<p><img height="70" width="55" src="/wp-content/uploads/Paul-McMillan1.jpg" /><strong>Siemens Delivers Virtualized Unified Communications with OpenScape UC Server 2010</strong></p>
<p><a href="/?lippis_pid=3077">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
</div>
<p>Arista Networks 7500 Family of Modular Switches</p>
<p>Arista Networks is a new comer to the data center Ethernet market, but its management team is seasoned and customer base growing.  It provides six fixed 10GbE switches; five 1/10GbE 7100 and the 1GbE 7048 along with the new Best of Interop awarding winning 7500 modular switch. The 7100/7048 switches connect servers in a Top-of-Rack configuration while the 7500 aggregates these switches and connects them to the internet and intranet.  This is a two-tier, “leaf-spine” architecture.  The 7500 boasts ultra high performance layer 2/3 1/10 Gb Ethernet switching for high performance computing and cloud computing data centers.  The 7500 supports 384 10GbE ports, 5.7Bpps at layer 2 or 3, high packet buffers 18GB deep, ultra low port-port latency of 4.5 microseconds and 10Terabit loss less switch fabric connecting modules. </p>
<p>The 7500 is 10GbE port dense, compact, cloud spec fast, green and prepared for 40 and 100GbE, with a price tag 50% below competitive offerings, according to Arista.  While the 7500’s hardware architecture is impressive, its operating system EOS, Extensible Operating System, offers another set of uniqueness. For example, all Arista switches run the same binary image of EOS, easing administration while hastening switch feature upgrades.  EOS is a modular OS that allows partners to run their software in the Arista switch, consolidating the number of management and network appliances required, thus increasing performance while reducing energy consumption and physical space.  Arista’s EOS modularity was designed as a unique state sharing architecture that separates switch state from protocol processing and application logic. EOS is built on top of a standard Linux kernel. All EOS processes run in their own protected memory space and exchange state through an in-memory database. This multi-process state sharing architecture provides the foundation for in-service-software updates and self-healing resiliency.  You can listen to a podcast interview with Douglas Gourlay, VP Marketing and Anshul Sadana, VP Customer &#038; Systems Engineering from Arista on the introduction of the 7500 Series of Ethernet switches <a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/arista-launches-greenest-fastest-and-highest-10gbe-density-data-center-switch-under-the-milky-way/">here</a></p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Meet the Challenge of Scaling Application Performance for the Global Organization</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3082">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>HP/3Com/H3C’s A12500 Core Data Center Switches<br />
</strong><br />
HP has spent 25 years building and selling networking products to its worldwide client base and is currently #2 in the market, with a 21% port count share and the fastest growing networking company in the industry.  The combined HP/3COM acquisition brings core switching products, the #1 market share position in China, TippingPoint Intrusion Prevention System and ProCurve edge switches, representing a new choice for clients who are frustrated by today’s current offerings.  HP will combine these two entities and operate under the banner of “HP Networking.” </p>
<p>The HP Converged Infrastructure Architecture and FlexFabric blueprint approach the modern data center with a vision that places networking at the center of an integrated data center solution and accelerates deployment of enterprise services and applications. It is designed to drive simplicity through streamlined network designs and centralized management, enhance agility with high performance security, and accelerated provisioning, and reduce cost with energy efficiency and low total cost of ownership. Central to HP FlexFabric is policy-driven network provisioning tightly integrated with server and storage management in an end-to-end data center converged infrastructure.  </p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Managing The Transition To Software Centric Communications</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3089">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>HP data center solutions are purpose built, using the latest advanced systems and ASIC technologies. “A” family data center networking platforms leverage a common operating system, Comware™ and are managed with a single-pane manager, Intelligent Management Center (IMC).  HP switches make use of an HP-developed technology &#8211; Intelligent Resilient Framework (IRF) &#8211; to create a resilient virtual switching fabric. IRF delivers geographic independence, distributed high-availability, resiliency and millisecond re-convergence across layer 2 and layer 3 protocols. These innovations allow customers to build a simplified, high performing, highly resilient and flat (two-tier) data center network design. They overcome the limitations of low performance/scale, high cost/latency inherent in legacy solutions, which rely on multi-tier network designs, disjointed platform operating systems and complex resiliency protocols.</p>
<p>A key enabler of this transformational design flexibly is the HP next-generation data center switching architecture.  This starts with the flagship HP A12500 core data center switch – which is based on a 100G design that uses a multi-level, multi-plane, non-blocking switching architecture to provide high performance and scalability.  The A12500 supports 6.66 Tbps of high-performance switching capacity (future support for 13.32 Tbps) and scales to 2.2 billion packets per second of forwarding performance.  The A12518 supports 512 10 Gigabit Ethernet or 864 Gigabit Ethernet ports in a single chassis.  Its future-proof design accommodates 40/100 Gigabit Ethernet and emerging unified network requirements such as end-to-end FCoE/Data Center Ethernet.</p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Unified Communications: Unleashing Transformation, Efficiency, Collaboration and Compliance</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3094">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p>Force10 Networks ExaScale E Series</p>
<p>Force10 Networks was one, if not the first company to offer 1 and 10Gb switching solutions for high-performance computing and data center markets in Fortune 100 companies, Internet portals, global carriers, leading research laboratories and government organizations.  It offers a wide range of Ethernet switching and routing products that deliver high port density and resiliency to help customers deploy a high-availability, agile and standards-based GbE and 10 GbE network fabric, while reducing power and cooling costs. Its Ethernet switching products are designed to leverage virtualized data center environments and automate Ethernet networking.  For example, its VirtualScale enables management of virtual chassis.  Its VirtualControl enables virtualizing logical switching and routing boundaries.  For automation, Force10 has developed an architecture, which automates network resource allocation as applications and services spin up and down.  This architecture is built upon its HyperLink and SwitchLink technology, two new software features implemented within its Force10 Operating System (FTOS).  HyperLink provides real-time communication between Force10 switches and hypervisors or virtual switches to enable automatic provisioning of one or many virtual LANs (VLANs) across multiple switches simultaneously. The SwitchLink feature provides real-time communication with middleware orchestration tools to enable automatic provisioning and management of virtual devices anywhere in the network.</p>
<p>Force10’s modular Ethernet switch data center product portfolio includes the ExaScale E-Series, optimized for core deployments in large-scale, high-performance 10GbE data centers, and the C-Series, optimized for mid-range data centers.  Both the E-Series and C-Series come in multiple form factors, run FTOS and are dense high performance switching platforms equipped with redundancy, availability, fault-tolerant operations and many line card options.  In addition, Force10 offers the fixed configuration S-Series product line for GbE and 10 GbE ToR configurations. Force10 promotes a vision of simplified data center topologies, using integrated switching and routing in the core, using chassis based E-Series or C-Series products, and fixed configuration ToR access products allowing both 1 tier and 2 tier designs.  One tier can be achieved with high density E-Series platform for server aggregation, switching at the server edge, and routing off the same platform to the Internet / WAN.   The two-tier architecture can be achieved leveraging ToR switching for server aggregation along with Force10’s chassis based systems in the core.   In addition to a large direct sales force, IBM OEM’s Force10’s ExaScale platform as part of IBM’s iDataPlex clustering solution. You can listen to a podcast interview with Steve Garrison, VP Marketing of Force10 on their 40 GbE offering <a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/force10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center/">here</a>.</p>
<div class="pod_rel">
<p class="pod_p">Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation</p>
<p><a class="pdf_icon" href="/?lippis_pid=3096">Get the White Paper</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>BLADE Network Technologies RackSwitch Family of Ethernet Switches<br />
</strong><br />
BLADE Network Technologies (BNT) has been working in the data center switch market since 2006 with much success providing 1/10Gb Ethernet switches for blade servers and top-of-rack configurations.  BLADE was launched from Nortel and made up of the successful Alteon Networks group.  Their success stems from their ability to identify the top-of-rack and blade switch market in ’06, along with an OEM go to market strategy that included all of the top tier blade server providers such as HP, IBM and NEC.   The result is that BLADE has shipped over 8m ports, achieved 25% growth from 2008 to 2009 (in a down economy), owns 50+ % of the blade switch market, is number 3 in the Fixed 10GbE market according to Dell’Oro Group, and has demonstrated scale with at least one customer installing over 16,000 of its switches.</p>
<p>BLADE offers the RackSwitch family of Ethernet switches, which are ToR, 1U high switches.  They include the 24-port 360ns latency RackSwitch G8100 10GbE, 48-port RackSwitch G8000 1/10 GbE aggregation and the 24-port 700ns latency RackSwitch G8124 10GbE.  Over a year ago, BLADE released its virtualization software called VMready that automates network settings for VM movement ensuring that network settings migrate when a VM is moved from one physical server to another.  VMready scales to a 1000 virtual port switch, is based on standards and works with most popular hypervisors.</p>
<p>In addition to VMready, RackSwitch’s unique attributes are found in the fact that they were designed for the data center versus being a wiring closet switch re-formatted for the data center.  For example, the RackSwitch BLADEOS supports CEE for unified fabrics, uplink failure detection, virtualization, dual homing for servers, low (80-170Watts) power consumption, back-to-front or front-to-back airflow and very low latency in the 700-360 nanosecond range.</p>
<p><strong>Voltaire’s Vantage 8500</strong></p>
<p>Voltaire has a long history in high performance computing and data center networking as it is one of the key leaders in the InfiniBand market.  Voltaire enjoys distribution relationships with HP and IBM, as well as Bull, Fujitsu, NEC, SGI and Oracle.  The result is a 100% + year over year revenue growth for Q1 as reported on May 5th.  Last October, Voltaire entered the 10 GbE market with the introduction of its Vantage 8500 Ethernet layer 2-core switch.  The Vantage 8500 boasts less than 1 microsecond of latency, a low 10 watts per port power consumption and 288 wire speed 10GbE ports in a 15U high chassis. The Vantage 8500’s unique industry contribution is that it’s based on converged enhanced Ethernet (CEE) technology providing InfiniBand-like capabilities to the Ethernet data center.  In fact, Voltaire has ported many of InfiniBand’s key characteristics to the Vantage 8500 such as a lossless switching fabric, multi-pathing, virtualization, fabric-wide congestion management and QoS.  </p>
<p>From a network design point of view, Voltaire supports a two tier network architecture that enables a simplified, ‘flat’ data center network and puts an end to the era of the over-provisioned network.  Voltaire’s design centered on the Vantage 8500 is to support a two-tier data center network that scales from hundreds to a few thousand core ports, which requires high capacity, non-blocking 10 Gigabit Ethernet core switches.  By clustering up to twelve Vantage 8500 switches together, IT business leaders can expand their data center to many thousands of servers while preserving the efficiency and price-per-port, without degrading performance or latency which occurs in traditional hierarchical network designs.  To support ToR implementations, Voltaire and BLADE Network Technologies announced recently a partnership where BLADE ToR RackSwitches are aggregated by Voltaire’s Vantage 8500, rounding out the two-tier data center Ethernet network architecture.</p>
<p>The Vantage 8500 also features software-based capabilities to address virtualized and converged data center environments. Voltaire’s Unified Fabric Manager™ (UFM) software, application acceleration software and management OS (VT-OS) provide management and performance enhancement tools.  These tools were developed and optimized in InfiniBand environments and are now available for Ethernet-based data centers. Voltaire’s recently introduced Unified Fabric Manager™ (UFM™) 3.0 software orchestrates physical and virtual switches delivering guaranteed levels of service per application. It’s the first and only Ethernet fabric management software that dynamically orchestrates end-to-end virtual machine connectivity for multi-vendor, scale-out data center networks.</p>
<p><strong>Avaya’s VSP 9000</strong></p>
<p>During the April 2009 Las Vegas Interop trade show, Nortel committed to the data center Ethernet market with the announcement of its Virtual Services Platform or VSP 9000 switch, which supports up to 27 Terabits per second (Tbps) of backplane switching and 240 10GbE ports per chassis at first release. Avaya announced their commitment to the VSP 9000 and said that it will be generally available in the second half of 2010 while already in controlled availability.  The VSP 9000 is built upon the Ethernet Routing Switch 8600/8800 software providing a proven software foundation, mid-plane architecture, a fully programmable network processor unit for flexible data forwarding and carrier-grade Linux. </p>
<p>The VSP 9000 is designed to deliver high-density 10GbE, 40GbE and 100GbE.  Its design center is rooted in highly dense connectivity environments that are all mission critical, by definition.  Early testing validation of the VSP 9000 promises to provide ultra-high reliability and availability delivering below 50ms failover support, which is critical to eliminate application disruption thanks to its patented hardware failure detection differentiation.  The VSP 9000 switch fabrics are lossless Ethernet capable and therefore well positioned to support the next generation Data Center requirements for convergence of storage onto the Ethernet infrastructure.</p>
<p>The VSP 9000’s unique network architecture is found in its ability to cluster four switches together, in that the total architecture exceeds 100 Tbs, with the number of 10GbE ports per rack being up to 720. Avaya continues to invest in Switch Clustering technology (Active/Active resiliency model) such as SMLT (split multi-link trunking) and RSMLT (routed-SMLT), which provides link, switch and router redundancy mechanisms. Three modules are being introduced in the first VSP 9000 release, a 24 port SFP+ for 1 GbE and 10 GbE connectivity, a 48-port of SFP module in addition to a 48-port 10/100/1000 TX module. Future plans include 40GbE and 100GbE interfaces, and even higher-capacity Switch Fabric modules.</p>
<p><strong>Juniper Networks’s EX8200 &#038; EX4500</strong></p>
<p>In January of 2008, Juniper Networks launched its much-anticipated entry into the enterprise Ethernet switch market.  Juniper&#8217;s focus is on the enterprise data center, campus and branch, as well as the service provider market.  Juniper provides a suite of Ethernet switch products, including the EX4200 with Virtual Chassis technology for GbE Top-of-Rack (ToR) and End-of-Row (EoR) data center access, the EX2500 24-port and new EX4500 48-port 10GbE ToR switches, and the EX8200 high-density, high-performance line of modular Ethernet switches.  </p>
<p>According to Juniper, it simplifies customer enterprise LAN architectures and advances the economics of networking via its most recently launched initiative called the &#8220;new network&#8221; for data centers.  Juniper’s “new network” promises critical innovations in automation, virtualization and fabric technologies.  These innovations are to reduce time to operation by up to 50 percent and eliminate up to 35 percent of data center networking capital expenditures.  One aspect of the &#8220;new network&#8221; is a simplified two-tier network architecture, which may be reduced to one when &#8220;Project Stratus&#8221; is completed with IBM.  The reduction of a three-tier architecture to two is accomplished by utilizing Juniper&#8217;s Virtual Chassis fabric technology in the access layer, in conjunction with its high-density, high-performance platforms such as EX8200 and EX4500 in the LAN core, thus eliminating the aggregation or distribution layer.  According to Juniper, collapsing the distribution layer reduces complexity in the data center as well as campus networks by reducing the number of managed devices by up to 89%, providing up to 39% savings in space, 44% savings in power and reducing the number of switch interactions by up to 99% compared to three-layer networks. According to Juniper, this approach improves application performance by also reducing latency up to 77% compared to three-layer networks. Note that these claims and numbers are Juniper&#8217;s and not mine.</p>
<p>At the core of Juniper&#8217;s data center Ethernet product family is the EX8200 line of modular switches. The EX8208 and EX8216 are eight and sixteen-slot modular switches. The EX8216 sports a maximum of 640 10GbE ports and 1.92Bpps and 6.2Tbps backplane speed.  The EX8200 is said to support 40GbE and 100GbE interfaces in the future.  The EX8200s connect either EX4200 GbE or EX2500 and EX4500 10GbE ToR switches together while providing access to internet/intranet.  All Juniper switches run Junos, the network operating system that provides reliability and availability features, developed for the high-performance enterprise and service provider market.</p>
<p><strong>Brocade’s NetIron MLX Series of Switches</strong></p>
<p>In July of 2008, Brocade had purchased Foundry Networks, catapulting them into the Ethernet switch market as one of the top five Ethernet switch/router vendors by revenue. Brocade, with its long history of data center storage, saw that converged I/O was going to happen and prepared the company to participate in this market.  At the high end of Brocade’s data center Ethernet switch products is the NetIron MLX-4, MLX-8, MLX-16 and MLX-32 routers, which support 4, 8, 16 and 32 I/O module slots, respectively.  We’ll focus on the high end NetIron MLX-32 here, which has been in production since August 2006.</p>
<p>The NetIron MLX-32 boasts a total of fully redundant non-blocking 7.68 Tbps switch fabric capacity.  Brocade says that the MLX-32 can forward some 2.284 Bpps of Layer 2/3 packets and support 1,536 and 256 non-blocking 1 GbE and 10 GbE ports, respectively.  Note that the new high density 10 GbE was announced the same day as this Research Note was made public.  All four NetIron MLX systems are designed for non-stop operation, supporting 1:1 management module redundancy, N+1 switch module redundancy, M+N power module redundancy and N+1 fan redundancy.  The NetIron MLX architecture is an adaptive self-routing Clos switch fabric with a virtual output queue (VOQ) design. This non-blocking architecture is optimized for maximum throughput and low latency for all packet sizes.</p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3109&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3109" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/lippis-report-149-high-end-10gbe-data-center-switches-reviewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Force10 Is First To Offer 40 Giga bit Ethernet For The Data Center</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/force10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/force10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Force10 Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40GbE. 100GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Force10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fforce10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcpcsQ%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Force10%20Is%20First%20To%20Offer%2040%20Giga%20bit%20Ethernet%20For%20The%20Data%20Center%20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1104" href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/12/gaining-network-visibility-into-virtualized-infrastructure/stepheng/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1104" title="stepheng" src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" alt="stepheng" width="125" height="150" /></a>While the networking industry is full steam ahead with the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fforce10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcpcsQ%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Force10%20Is%20First%20To%20Offer%2040%20Giga%20bit%20Ethernet%20For%20The%20Data%20Center%20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1104" href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/12/gaining-network-visibility-into-virtualized-infrastructure/stepheng/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1104" title="stepheng" src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/stepheng.jpg" alt="stepheng" width="125" height="150" /></a>While the networking industry is full steam ahead with the transition from 1 to 10 Gb Ethernet in corporate uplinks plus virtualized and cloud spec data centers, the IEEE has been working on 40 and 100Gb Ethernet standards to be ratified soon. It’s anticipated that the 40GbE standard will be completed first and built with lower cost, long-range optical components than 100GbE. The question on the minds of most IT business leaders is when and where to deploy these ultra high-speed Ethernet technologies and at what cost? We answer these questions with Steve Garrison, Vice President, Marketing of Force10 Networks. We’ll dive into Force10’s 40 GbE leadership position and the new network design options it unleashes upon IT business leaders.
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/force10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center/">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3067&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3067" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/force10-is-first-to-offer-40-giga-bit-ethernet-for-the-data-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cache Architecture In WAN Optimization: It’s Not The Only Criteria in Vendor Selection</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/cache-architecture-in-wan-optimization-it%e2%80%99s-not-the-only-criteria-in-vendor-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/cache-architecture-in-wan-optimization-it%e2%80%99s-not-the-only-criteria-in-vendor-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 21:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought Leader Podcast Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branch office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cache architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco. Riverbed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=3031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fcache-architecture-in-wan-optimization-it%25e2%2580%2599s-not-the-only-criteria-in-vendor-selection%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcdFSi%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Cache%20Architecture%20In%20WAN%20Optimization%3A%20It%E2%80%99s%20Not%20The%20Only%20Criteria%20in%20Vendor%20Selection%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/Baruch-photo1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3065" title="Baruch photo1" src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/Baruch-photo1-150x150.jpg" alt="Baruch photo1" width="150" height="150" /></a>WAN optimization products are central to delivering excellent application performance&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fcache-architecture-in-wan-optimization-it%25e2%2580%2599s-not-the-only-criteria-in-vendor-selection%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FcdFSi%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Cache%20Architecture%20In%20WAN%20Optimization%3A%20It%E2%80%99s%20Not%20The%20Only%20Criteria%20in%20Vendor%20Selection%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/Baruch-photo1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3065" title="Baruch photo1" src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/Baruch-photo1-150x150.jpg" alt="Baruch photo1" width="150" height="150" /></a>WAN optimization products are central to delivering excellent application performance to employees in branch offices especially as applications continue to be centralized in data centers.  Another key attribute of WAN optimization is that these solutions reduce WAN bandwidth requirements thus spend.  At the heart of WAN optimization technology is cache architecture, or how device stores or caches data to minimize WAN transfers.  We dive into the two main cache architecture approaches; “per peer” and “universal” then ask the key question.  Does caching architectures and cache sizing affect WAN optimization performance or are there other more important aspects of WAN optimization that buyers should be concerned with as they undergo vendor selection”?  In this Lippis Report podcast, I talk with Baruch Deutsch, Senior Director of Product Marketing at Cisco Systems, to demystify WAN optimization. Enjoy, Nick
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/cache-architecture-in-wan-optimization-it%e2%80%99s-not-the-only-criteria-in-vendor-selection/">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=3031&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_3031" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/05/cache-architecture-in-wan-optimization-it%e2%80%99s-not-the-only-criteria-in-vendor-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Virtualization Comes of Age</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/network-virtualization-comes-of-age/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/network-virtualization-comes-of-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought Leader Podcast Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=2834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fnetwork-virtualization-comes-of-age%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2Fbg5a2%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Network%20Virtualization%20Comes%20of%20Age%20%20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/network-virtualization-comes-of-age/3in1-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-2879"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/3in11.jpg" alt="3in1" title="3in1" width="125" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2879" /></a>A panel of IT business leaders discusses their experience with&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fnetwork-virtualization-comes-of-age%2F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2Fbg5a2%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Network%20Virtualization%20Comes%20of%20Age%20%20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/network-virtualization-comes-of-age/3in1-2/" rel="attachment wp-att-2879"><img src="http://lippisreport.com/wp-content/uploads/3in11.jpg" alt="3in1" title="3in1" width="125" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2879" /></a>A panel of IT business leaders discusses their experience with Network Virtualization as we dive into motivations, design options, economics and business outcomes.  On the panel is Marilyn Hay, Manager of the Network Management Centre at the University of British Columbia, Frank Hoonhout, Senior Lead Network Engineer at the State of Oregon’s State Data Center and Hasan Siraj, Director of Product Marketing at Cisco Systems.  This is a podcast you surely want to listen to.</p>
<p>Find out the real world value and business outcome of investing in Network Virtualization by listening to this podcast.
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/network-virtualization-comes-of-age/">Listen to the Podcast</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=2834&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_2834" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/04/network-virtualization-comes-of-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading the Data Center to 10 Gigabit Ethernet!</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/upgrading-the-data-center-to-10-gigabit-ethernet/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/upgrading-the-data-center-to-10-gigabit-ethernet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arista Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidated I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabit Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=2438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fupgrading-the-data-center-to-10-gigabit-ethernet%2F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Upgrading%20the%20Data%20Center%20to%2010%20Gigabit%20Ethernet%21%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><strong>By Arista</strong></p>
<p>The standard for 10 Gigabit Ethernet (IEEE802.3ae) was ratified&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fupgrading-the-data-center-to-10-gigabit-ethernet%2F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Upgrading%20the%20Data%20Center%20to%2010%20Gigabit%20Ethernet%21%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><strong>By Arista</strong></p>
<p>The standard for 10 Gigabit Ethernet (IEEE802.3ae) was ratified in 2002. While 10GbE deployments have grown every year since then, the technology has primarily been used to interconnect switches and routers. Almost all of the server connections in data centers have remained at 1 Gbps, limiting the amount of network throughput available to each server. With recent enhancements in CPU performance, system I/O, and storage I/O the gigabit network has increasingly become the application and workload performance bottleneck.<br />
The primary reason for staying with Gigabit Ethernet has been cost-performance. Until recently it has been more cost-effective to have multiple GbE connections rather than a single 10 GbE port. In addition, most installed servers typically cannot utilize the full bandwidth of a 10 GbE connection. However both of these factors are changing, which are leading to widespread adoption of 10 GbE for server connectivity over the next few years.</p>
<p>Download this white paper for an overview of the factors that are driving the growth for 10 GbE in the data center.
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/upgrading-the-data-center-to-10-gigabit-ethernet/">Get the White Paper</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=2438&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_2438" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/upgrading-the-data-center-to-10-gigabit-ethernet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Cisco IT Consolidates I/O in the Data Center</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/how-cisco-it-consolidates-io-in-the-data-center/</link>
		<comments>http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/how-cisco-it-consolidates-io-in-the-data-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicholaslippis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unified Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 GbE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidated I/O]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=2431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fhow-cisco-it-consolidates-io-in-the-data-center%2F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22How%20Cisco%20IT%20Consolidates%20I%2FO%20in%20the%20Data%20Center%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><strong>By Cisco Systems</strong></p>
<p>Cisco IT is transforming its data centers with&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Flippisreport.com%2F2010%2F01%2Fhow-cisco-it-consolidates-io-in-the-data-center%2F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22How%20Cisco%20IT%20Consolidates%20I%2FO%20in%20the%20Data%20Center%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><strong>By Cisco Systems</strong></p>
<p>Cisco IT is transforming its data centers with solutions that help to realize the company’s Data Center 3.0 vision, which employs a unified network fabric to connect servers and storage devices in a way that is resilient, scalable, and easy to manage. The transformation occurs in three stages:  1) Consolidating I/O and increasing throughput by implementing unified I/O running on 10 Gigabit Ethernet (current stage); 2) Increasing the power available to compute resources by reducing the power consumed by the network infrastructure and; 3) Making applications location-independent, which will simplify changes and possibly eliminate the need for change requests</p>
<p>Learn how Cisco is deploying consolidated I/O in their data center by downloading this paper.
</p>
<p><a href="http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/how-cisco-it-consolidates-io-in-the-data-center/">Get the White Paper</a></p>
<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://lippisreport.com/?p=2431&amp;akst_action=share-this"  title="Email, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_2431" class="akst_share_link" rel="noindex nofollow">ShareThis</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lippisreport.com/2010/01/how-cisco-it-consolidates-io-in-the-data-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
