<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Special Edition Lippis Report on Network Security Issue 4: Deploying Teleworking Solutions in Scale: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lippisreport.com/2008/09/special-edition-lippis-report-on-network-security-issue-4-deploying-teleworking-solutions-in-scale-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lippisreport.com/2008/09/special-edition-lippis-report-on-network-security-issue-4-deploying-teleworking-solutions-in-scale-part-1/</link>
	<description>Resources for Network / IT Business Decision Makers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Lippis</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2008/09/special-edition-lippis-report-on-network-security-issue-4-deploying-teleworking-solutions-in-scale-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-187863</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Lippis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=984#comment-187863</guid>
		<description>Can  you post the Homeseer case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can  you post the Homeseer case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeseer</title>
		<link>http://lippisreport.com/2008/09/special-edition-lippis-report-on-network-security-issue-4-deploying-teleworking-solutions-in-scale-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-187548</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeseer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lippisreport.com/?p=984#comment-187548</guid>
		<description>The security issues associated with teleworking are not something to be glossed over lightly.  A compromise of customer data can cost millions and many employees are lax about keeping their 2 factor identification tokens with the laptops, negating any advantage associated with physical theft.  Like the recent Homeseer case, small thefts can occur with virtually no notification to corporate IT, as everything appears above board when so many simultaneous remote connections exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The security issues associated with teleworking are not something to be glossed over lightly.  A compromise of customer data can cost millions and many employees are lax about keeping their 2 factor identification tokens with the laptops, negating any advantage associated with physical theft.  Like the recent Homeseer case, small thefts can occur with virtually no notification to corporate IT, as everything appears above board when so many simultaneous remote connections exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

